|
|
Post by Aslan Cross on Jan 14, 2005 17:48:48 GMT -5
Bringing the A-Up discussion to its own thread.
Option A:
[/li][li] (X), A-up (C)/(SC) gives +3 damage.
[/li][li] (V), (R), and x and # multihits, it gives +5
[/li][li] Anything else, it gives +10 damage.
Option B:
[/li][li] A-Up (C)/(SC) give +5 damage for all weapons.
Option C: Leave them alone.
|
|
|
|
Post by WesleyGibson on Jan 14, 2005 18:00:50 GMT -5
I voted A, but I'm working on the assumption their cost is gonna go down some if that happens. With two nerfs having gone into them recently (counting the likelihood of this one) they probably shouldn't cost quite so much.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blaine Kodos on Jan 14, 2005 18:17:07 GMT -5
I voted C. I personally don't see them as enough of a problem to really worry about. Besides, Tanking is apparently the devil, so the values help that.
Or something.
I dunno, I just voted C.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tavish on Jan 14, 2005 18:20:58 GMT -5
If you're gonna change it, not A. It's too convoluted, and presents an unnecessary amount of additional rules to what should be a simple, direct item.
I voted B, as I'm willing to say, perhaps they need to be changed. But if so, then it should be direct and simple, not... like that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rekan Yuusha on Jan 14, 2005 19:13:03 GMT -5
I had to vote C, because considering the current balance problem we have is defense being better than offense, I don't see nerfing the most used Offensive thing as a good idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lyonesse on Jan 14, 2005 19:40:52 GMT -5
Make fighting against tankers harder than it is already. Hur hur. I don't like that. *voted for C*
|
|
|
|
Post by ^Keiichi_Morisato on Jan 14, 2005 19:44:23 GMT -5
What solo and Ebanis said.
|
|
|
|
Post by Signal on Jan 14, 2005 21:14:52 GMT -5
Voted for C
because both ideas just complicate matters worse...
|
|
|
|
Post by Arad Baranga on Jan 15, 2005 1:19:54 GMT -5
Ultimately, if we would change them, I would much much prefer B, for the reasons Tavish stated, and for the reasons I stated in the other thread.
However, I don't think it's all that urgent to change them. Choice: C
|
|
|
|
Post by Ryune Zoldark on Jan 15, 2005 4:28:22 GMT -5
I choose C.
And I don't have anything to say that isn't already said.
|
|
|
|
Post by Julius Firefocht on Jan 15, 2005 6:28:46 GMT -5
I choose C, I just thought that they are fine as it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by RurouninMao on Jan 15, 2005 9:35:00 GMT -5
B for me, simplest solution. Make the V-ups more coveted (you might want to lower the price on those ^^ )
|
|
|
|
Post by Avitar Diggs on Jan 15, 2005 13:07:26 GMT -5
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rooster on Jan 15, 2005 18:36:33 GMT -5
I have no problems with them as they are... other than recommending to make them non-stackable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aslan Cross on Jan 15, 2005 18:41:11 GMT -5
Judging by the results so far, I think it's safe to say we'll have to leave them alone. I was wondering why people weren't speaking against this in the (X) nerfing thread, though, since that's where the ideas for this started.
|
|
. 
